Introduction

The workplace has fundamentally shifted. What began as a pandemic-era necessity has evolved into a strategic imperative for Singapore employers. Since the Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests (TG-FWAR) took effect on 1 December 2024, every employer in Singapore must now have formal processes in place for employees to request flexible work arrangements—and proper procedures to consider those requests fairly.

Yet many employers remain uncertain about what compliance actually looks like. What constitutes a valid business reason for rejection? How do you build a process that satisfies the guidelines without overwhelming your HR team? And how do you balance employee flexibility with genuine operational needs?

This comprehensive guide answers these questions and more, providing Singapore employers with actionable frameworks, practical templates, and implementation strategies to navigate the new FWA landscape confidently.

Executive Summary

The Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests (TG-FWAR) establish Singapore's first mandatory framework for handling employee requests for workplace flexibility. Here's what every employer needs to know:

• All employers must have formal processes for employees to submit and have their FWA requests properly considered
• Written responses required within two months of receiving any formal request
• Three categories of FWAs covered: Flexi-place (location), Flexi-time (hours), and Flexi-load (workload)
• Rejections must be based on reasonable business grounds—personal bias or organisational tradition are explicitly unacceptable
• Non-compliance consequences include warnings from MOM and mandatory corrective workshops
• Employees who complete probation are eligible to make formal requests under the guidelines

Understanding the TG-FWAR Framework

What Are the Tripartite Guidelines?

The Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests represent a significant evolution in Singapore's approach to workplace flexibility. Announced on 16 April 2024 and effective from 1 December 2024, these guidelines replace both the Tripartite Advisory on Flexible Work Arrangements (issued in 2014) and the Tripartite Standard on Flexible Work Arrangements (launched in 2017).

Developed by a workgroup comprising representatives from the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), and the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF), the guidelines establish clear expectations for both employers and employees around flexible work requests.

The Three Categories of Flexible Work Arrangements

The guidelines define FWAs broadly as work arrangements where employers and employees agree to vary from standard work arrangements. These fall into three categories:

Flexi-Place Arrangements allow employees to work from locations other than their usual workplace. Examples include telecommuting, work-from-home arrangements, and working from co-working spaces or satellite offices. This category gained significant traction during the pandemic and remains the most commonly requested type of FWA.

Flexi-Time Arrangements enable employees to vary their working hours without changing their total work hours or workload. This includes staggered start and end times, compressed work weeks (such as working four 10-hour days instead of five 8-hour days), and flexible shift arrangements. These arrangements are particularly valuable for employees managing caregiving responsibilities or long commutes.

Flexi-Load Arrangements involve adjustments to workload with corresponding changes to remuneration. Examples include part-time work, job sharing arrangements, and reduced-hour contracts. Employees might request these when managing significant life changes, returning from extended leave, or transitioning toward retirement.

Employees may request one type of FWA, a combination of multiple types, or even propose arrangements not explicitly listed in the guidelines—the framework is designed to be flexible in itself.

Who Is Covered by the Guidelines?

Employee Eligibility

The TG-FWAR establishes that all employees who have completed their probation period are entitled to submit formal FWA requests. This is an important threshold—employers are not obligated to consider formal requests from employees still on probation, though they may choose to do so.

Probation periods vary by employer and role, typically ranging from three to six months in Singapore. Once an employee completes probation, they gain the right to have their formal FWA requests properly considered under the guidelines.

Employer Obligations

The guidelines apply to all employers in Singapore, regardless of company size or industry. This includes multinational corporations, SMEs, government-linked companies, and startups alike. There are no exemptions based on headcount or sector.

This universal application reflects the Government's recognition that flexible work arrangements benefit Singapore's economy broadly—from enabling caregivers to remain in the workforce to helping companies access talent pools that might otherwise be unavailable.

The Formal FWA Request Process

Establishing Your Company's Process

One of the core requirements under the TG-FWAR is that employers must have a clear, documented process for employees to submit formal FWA requests. This process should specify several key elements.

First, establish how requests should be submitted. This might be through your HR portal, a designated email address, a specific form, or your line management structure. The method matters less than having a consistent, documented approach.

Second, define what information requests must contain. At minimum, formal requests should include the date of request, the type of FWA being requested, the expected frequency and duration, the reason for the request, and proposed start and end dates if applicable.

Third, identify who will evaluate requests and through what process. Will direct supervisors make initial assessments? Will HR be involved? Is there a review committee for complex requests? Document this clearly.

Fourth, establish communication protocols—how and when will decisions be communicated? What follow-up mechanisms exist for questions or appeals?

What Happens Without a Formal Process?

Here's a crucial point many employers miss: if you don't have a formal FWA request process, employees can still make formal requests under the guidelines—and these requests would be considered valid if they contain the minimum required information.

The guidelines explicitly state that in the absence of an employer-specified process, an employee may make a formal request via email or text message, provided it includes the date of request, FWA details (type, frequency, duration), the reason for the request, and proposed start and end dates.

This means a simple WhatsApp message like "I'd like to request to change my work hours from 8am-5pm to 10am-7pm starting 1 February so I can send my child to school. I'm requesting this arrangement until December." would qualify as a formal FWA request requiring a written response within two months.

The lesson is clear: establish your own process before employees create informal workarounds that may be harder to track and manage.

Evaluating FWA Requests Properly

The Principle of Proper Consideration

At the heart of the TG-FWAR is the requirement for "proper consideration" of FWA requests. But what does this actually mean in practice?

Proper consideration requires employers to assess each request based on genuine business factors—specifically, how the requested arrangement would affect the employee's job performance and business operations. This evaluation should be conducted on a case-by-case basis, recognising that what works for one role may not work for another.

The guidelines encourage employers to engage employees in open, constructive discussions about their requests. This isn't meant to be an adversarial process. The goal is finding mutually acceptable arrangements where possible, or clearly communicating why a particular arrangement isn't feasible for the business.

Reasonable Grounds for Rejection

Employers retain full discretion to approve or reject FWA requests—but rejections must be based on reasonable business grounds. The guidelines provide helpful guidance on what constitutes acceptable reasons:

Cost considerations are valid when implementing the FWA would result in significant additional expenses. This might include the need to hire additional staff, invest in new technology infrastructure, or incur substantial operational costs that the business cannot reasonably absorb.

Productivity and output concerns are legitimate when the FWA would demonstrably reduce work quality or quantity, or negatively impact the organisation's ability to serve customers. This requires genuine assessment of the role's requirements rather than assumptions about remote work effectiveness.

Feasibility issues arise when the nature of the job simply cannot accommodate the requested arrangement. Some roles require physical presence—a chef cannot cook remotely, and a security guard cannot patrol premises from home. Feasibility also covers situations where accommodating one employee's request would require unsustainable changes to colleagues' arrangements.

Operational capacity limitations occur when there's no practical way to redistribute work or restructure schedules without hiring additional staff that the budget doesn't support.

What Constitutes Unreasonable Rejection

The guidelines are equally explicit about what does not constitute valid grounds for rejection:

Personal bias against FWAs is explicitly cited as unacceptable. If management simply "doesn't believe" in flexible work, that's not a business reason—it's a preference that must yield to the proper evaluation framework.

Supervisor preference for "direct sight" of employees is specifically called out as unreasonable when the employee has demonstrated consistent satisfactory performance. If an employee delivers results working remotely, a supervisor's comfort with visual monitoring doesn't override their track record.

Organisational tradition of requiring office presence is not a valid reason. "We've always done it this way" or "Everyone else works from the office" doesn't address whether the specific arrangement would actually harm business outcomes.

Fear of precedent-setting is also not acceptable. Concerns that approving one request will lead to a flood of similar requests must be addressed through proper policy-making—not by rejecting individual requests on non-business grounds.

Responding to FWA Requests

The Two-Month Timeline

Employers must provide a written decision on formal FWA requests within two months of receiving them. This timeline includes all discussions, clarifications, and negotiations—not just the final decision communication.

Best practice is to acknowledge requests within one week, conduct initial assessment and any needed discussions within four to six weeks, and communicate final decisions with sufficient time remaining in the two-month window.

If you need more information to evaluate a request, engage the employee promptly. Don't wait until the deadline approaches to begin conversations.

Communicating Approvals

When approving FWA requests, your written response should clearly document the arrangement's terms, any conditions or expectations, review dates, and what would trigger reconsideration of the arrangement. This protects both parties by establishing clear expectations.

Consider including trial periods for new arrangements—a three-month trial with a review meeting gives both employer and employee an opportunity to assess whether the FWA is working before making it permanent.

Communicating Rejections

When rejecting requests, you must provide the reason for rejection in your written response. This reason should reference specific business factors—not vague concerns or personal preferences.

Good rejection communication also includes an invitation to discuss alternative arrangements. Perhaps the employee requested to work from home three days per week, but operational needs only support one day. Offering a modified arrangement shows good faith consideration and may still address some of the employee's underlying needs.

TAFEP provides template response forms that employers can adapt, available on their official website. Using standardised templates helps ensure consistency and completeness in your communications.

Building a Sustainable FWA Policy

Beyond Compliance: Strategic Advantages

While the TG-FWAR sets minimum requirements, forward-thinking employers recognise that well-designed FWA policies offer strategic advantages beyond mere compliance.

Talent attraction improves significantly. Research indicates that a substantial portion of Singapore workers would consider changing jobs for better flexibility. In a competitive talent market, FWA offerings can differentiate your employer brand.

Employee retention benefits as well. When employees feel their work-life needs are respected, loyalty increases and turnover decreases. This matters particularly in Singapore's tight labour market where replacement costs are substantial.

Workforce participation expands when flexibility enables caregivers, people with disabilities, and older workers to remain economically active. Singapore's aging population makes this increasingly important for maintaining overall workforce capacity.

Productivity gains often accompany well-implemented FWAs. Reduced commute time, fewer interruptions, and improved work-life balance can enhance rather than diminish output—provided appropriate management practices are in place.

For a deeper exploration of implementing flexible and hybrid work models effectively, see our companion article on Hybrid Work Models: Best Practices for Singapore Employers.

Key Policy Components

A comprehensive FWA policy should address several key areas beyond the minimum compliance requirements.

Eligibility criteria define who can request what types of arrangements. While the TG-FWAR covers post-probation employees, you might extend eligibility or define role-specific considerations.

Available arrangement types give employees clarity on what options exist. Some organisations offer a menu of pre-approved arrangements; others take a more open-ended approach to proposals.

Request and evaluation procedures document how the process works end-to-end, building on your TG-FWAR compliance process with additional internal steps as needed.

Terms and conditions for approved arrangements cover expectations around availability, communication, equipment, expenses, and performance standards.

Review and modification provisions establish how and when arrangements will be reassessed, and under what circumstances they might be modified or discontinued.

Management guidance equips supervisors with tools and frameworks for supporting employees on FWAs while maintaining team effectiveness.

Managing Employees on Flexible Arrangements

Performance Management Adaptations

The TG-FWAR specifically addresses performance management, emphasising that employees on FWAs should be assessed based on actual work outcomes, not physical presence or perceived availability.

This requires many organisations to evolve their performance management approaches. Traditional metrics around time-in-office become irrelevant for remote workers. Instead, focus on deliverables, quality of output, collaboration effectiveness, and goal achievement.

Clear expectations matter more than ever. When an employee works different hours or locations, both parties need explicit alignment on what success looks like. Document key deliverables, response time expectations, and quality standards.

Regular check-ins maintain connection and provide opportunities to address issues early. Managers should schedule consistent one-on-ones with all team members, regardless of their work arrangements.

Maintaining Team Cohesion

One legitimate business concern around FWAs is the potential impact on team dynamics and culture. Address this proactively rather than using it as a blanket reason for rejection.

Establish core collaboration times when team members are expected to be available simultaneously. This might be specific days for in-office presence or protected hours for synchronous communication.

Invest in appropriate technology. Video conferencing, collaboration platforms, and project management tools enable effective distributed teamwork when properly implemented.

Create intentional social connection opportunities. When organic office interactions decrease, schedule deliberate team-building activities, both virtual and in-person.

Train managers specifically on leading hybrid or flexible teams. The skills required differ somewhat from traditional management, and many supervisors benefit from targeted development.

Handling Difficulties and Discontinuation

Not every FWA arrangement works out. Build provisions for addressing problems and, if necessary, discontinuing arrangements that aren't meeting business needs.

Define what would constitute grounds for modifying or ending an approved FWA. This might include performance falling below acceptable standards, business conditions changing materially, or the employee not adhering to agreed terms.

Establish review processes that assess arrangement effectiveness periodically. Three-month or six-month reviews give both parties structured opportunities to raise concerns.

Document expectations around notice periods and transition processes if an arrangement needs to end. Employees should understand that FWAs, while valued, aren't guaranteed indefinitely.

Compliance and Enforcement

What Happens If Employers Don't Comply?

The TG-FWAR, while not legislation in the strict sense, carries meaningful consequences for non-compliance. The guidelines state that TAFEP and MOM will take action against employers who fail to implement proper processes or who reject requests on unreasonable grounds.

For first-time or minor infractions, TAFEP typically engages employers educationally, helping them understand the guidelines and improve their practices.

For employers who remain non-compliant or wilfully refuse to follow the guidelines, MOM may issue formal warnings and require attendance at corrective workshops. These workshops provide HR training on FWA best practices and guideline compliance.

While these consequences are educational rather than punitive—there are no fines or criminal penalties specified—they signal regulatory seriousness. Moreover, repeated non-compliance could have broader implications for an employer's relationship with MOM, potentially affecting other areas like work pass applications.

Employee Recourse

Employees whose requests are rejected on unreasonable grounds or who don't receive timely responses have several avenues for recourse.

First, internal grievance procedures should be used wherever possible. The guidelines encourage resolving disagreements through existing company channels before escalating externally.

If internal processes don't resolve the issue, employees may approach TAFEP for advice and assistance. TAFEP will engage the employer to understand the situation and encourage guideline compliance.

Unionised employees can also seek support from their unions in navigating FWA disputes with employers.

Industry-Specific Considerations

Small Business Considerations

SMEs face particular challenges implementing FWA frameworks with limited HR resources. Here are practical approaches for smaller organisations.

Keep processes simple but documented. A basic form and checklist can provide the necessary structure without bureaucratic overhead.

Leverage free resources from TAFEP, which provides template policies, request forms, and response templates that SMEs can adapt with minimal effort.

Consider cross-training to build operational resilience. When team members can cover for each other, flexibility becomes more feasible without disrupting service delivery.

Focus on feasibility conversations rather than elaborate evaluation frameworks. Small teams often know intuitively what arrangements can work—document the reasoning and proceed.

Implementation Checklist for Employers

To ensure your organisation is fully compliant with the TG-FWAR and positioned to manage FWA requests effectively, work through this implementation checklist:

1. Establish a formal request process with clear submission methods, required information, and evaluation workflows
2. Create or update your FWA policy documenting available arrangements, eligibility, terms, and review provisions
3. Develop template forms for requests and responses, adapting TAFEP templates as appropriate
4. Train HR personnel on guideline requirements and evaluation criteria
5. Educate managers on proper consideration principles and unreasonable rejection grounds
6. Communicate with employees about the process and their rights under the guidelines
7. Establish tracking mechanisms to monitor request volumes, response times, and approval rates
8. Review existing informal arrangements to ensure they're properly documented
9. Set up review processes for approved arrangements with appropriate cadence
10. Create escalation procedures for disputes or complex requests

Conclusion

The Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests represent Singapore's recognition that workplace flexibility is essential for a modern, competitive economy. For employers, compliance is non-negotiable—but the opportunity extends far beyond avoiding regulatory consequences.

Organisations that embrace well-designed FWA policies will attract stronger talent, retain valuable employees, and build more resilient operations. Those that treat the guidelines as merely bureaucratic overhead will struggle in an increasingly competitive labour market where workers expect—and can often find—flexibility.

Start with compliance. Build proper processes, train your managers, and ensure you can evaluate requests fairly and respond within required timeframes. Then move beyond minimum requirements to develop FWA policies that genuinely support both employee wellbeing and business success.

The future of work in Singapore is flexible. The TG-FWAR provides the framework; how you build upon it will determine whether your organisation thrives in this new environment.

References

• Ministry of Manpower. (2024). Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests. Singapore: Ministry of Manpower.
• Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices. (2024). Guide to Managing Flexible Work Arrangement Requests (For Employers). Singapore: TAFEP.
• Ministry of Manpower. (2024). Launch of Tripartite Guidelines on FWA Requests and Tripartite Workgroup Report. Singapore: Ministry of Manpower.
• Made for Families. (2024). Tripartite Guidelines and Standards. Singapore: Government of Singapore.

‍